Discussing the Claim that Freewill and Determinism are...

Discussing the Claim that Freewill and Determinism are Incompatible A person’s â€Å"will† is their ability to decide and choose among different options. The term â€Å"freewill† suggests that the choice this person has made, although it may have been influenced by outside circumstances or people, was ultimately his or her own choice. There is a related principle. It generally states that â€Å"ought† implies â€Å"can†. If someone ought to do something that implies that they can do it. After all, if they cannot do something then surely they are not obliged to do it. For example: If I see a drowning child in a rushing river and I cannot swim, then I cannot be blamed if I do not jump in and try and save the child? I†¦show more content†¦A traditional Judeo-Christian view is that human beings are free, autonomous agents, responsible for their own actions. In Genesis, Adam and Eve exercise their freewill by choosing to eat the forbidden fruit. They are held responsible for their actions, and God punishes them, banishing them from Eden. Many of the main Christian denominations therefore believe that we are free to choose whether to do good or sin. However the Protestant Church holds the view that God has chosen who will be saved and who will not on Judgement Day. This idea, which originates from St Paul’s letter to the Romans, is called â€Å"predestination† â€Å"And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.† The idea that God decides who receives salvation and who doesn’t at creation suggests that humans don’t have freewill with regard to their moral or religious behaviour. The idea suggests that salvation cannot be achieved through actions on this earth, but through God’s grace alone. As regards to the ethical ramifications of such a view, the notion that human beings are not autonomous moral agents raises a number of problems. If we aren’t free, how can we be morally responsible for our actions, and how can we be punished for those actions; and

Identify the Stakeholders Involved in this Situation

Question: Discuss about the Report for Identify the Stakeholders Involved in this Situation. Answer: The process of identifying the stakeholders is one of the most effective initiatives for any participatory planning. In the given scenario, the involvement of the concerned stakeholders must have been identified to provide sustainability to the project. Meanwhile, stakeholders are primarily an individual person or a group of people that will be expected to be affected by an anticipated intervention. Following the criteria of identifying the stakeholders, in this particular case scenario, three key stakeholders have been recognised (Moore, Langabeer and Markham, 2010). Meanwhile, the owner of Brady Industrial Products and the Localtown Bank have been identified as the key stakeholders involved in this loan covenants scenario. Under the current circumstances given in the script, both the owner of Brady Industrial Products and the Localtown Bank will be mostly affected by any projected intervention. Moreover, the key stakeholders are the most affected persons or institutions to be affected in case of any negative responses (Sswm.info, 2016). Through the identification of the direct linkage with the loan scenario, the owner of Brady Industrial Products and the Localtown Bank have been picked as the key identified stakeholders engaged to the event. Now, the reason for selecting the two as major stakeholders should have been established for argument. Meanwhile, the business of Brady Industrial Products has financially backed up by the Localtown Bank and the owner of the company, to say the least. Understandably, the banking institution and the owner of the firm will be mostly affected due to any proposed interventions (Cotton, 2012). In the case of adverse situation, the two of the stakeholders can suffer massive financial losses. Considering the case scenario, it can be seen that the Localtown Bank has put forward a criteria of minimum quick ratio that must be maintained by any organisation to apply for a loan from the financial institution (Jain, 2014). In the current situation, it can be seen that the current asset subtracting the inventories for Brady Industrial Products stands at $1,100,000 and the current liabilities stands at $1,000,000. Hence, the only solution that can be used by the company to maintain an adequate ratio is to consider the loan taken by the owner as a current asset because there is only 14 months left for the repayment of the money. Hence, the incident explained in the case scenario brings in two entities that can be impacted by the incident. One is the owner of the firm and the other is the Localtown Bank (Djukic, Stankovic and Lepojevic, 2015). Along with that, another stakeholder that is impacted by the Loan Covenants incident is the company itself. This is because a firm is considered as a separate entity itself. Any problem occurred due to the unethical mean of financial re-statement may impact the business as well (Jain, 2014). Hence, it can be seen that three primary entities can be affected by the loan covenant process, which are identified as the stakeholders involved in this situation (Djukic, Stankovic and Lepojevic, 2015). Furthermore, in the case of identification of the misconduct, the reputation and job of the accountant Sharon Rock and Tim OShea are also in risk. Hence, they are also considered as secondary stakeholders involved in the situation. References Cotton, J. (2012). Personal communication- Involving key stakeholders in the review process: A multi-method approach.Health Education Journal, 61(1), pp.87-90. Djukic, S., Stankovic, L. and Lepojevic, V. (2015). Improvement of Innovation Capacity of SMEs in Serbia by Connecting With Key Stakeholders.Engineering Economics, 26(4). Jain, A. (2014). Transparent Collaboration Amongst Stakeholders - The Key To Project Performance.OTMCJ, 6(2). Moore, A., Langabeer, J. and Markham, C. (2010).An intervention mapping approach. Sswm.info. (2016).Stakeholder Identification | SSWM. [online] Available at: https://www.sswm.info/content/stakeholder-identification [Accessed Sep. 2016].